There are unresolved land claims linked to particular long-ago ancestors in the region where I live. The land was stolen by the government with no Treaty, agreement, arrangement, or compensation exchanged for the land.
In 1648, Algonquin leader Tchi8ant8, baptized as Charles Pachirini, was granted land for him and his clan at Three Rivers.
However, from 1656, the Jesuits granted lots to French settlers. By 1663, Pachirni & family had hardly any land left.
A few years after Pachirini’s passing, the Governor of France gave to the Jesuits whatever was left of the Algonquin parcel of land at the Three Rivers, without consent nor negotiation with the Algonquin Nation.
Here’s the 1699 contract, transcribed and translated.
Despite this acknowledgement and agreement, no further action was undertaken to return land nor compensate the Algonquins of the Three Rivers.
In 1795, Nicholas Montour, great-grandson of Pachirini’s clan member Marie Mite8agami8k8e, began to purchase the rights the two first of four Seigneuries: Tonnancourt, also known as Pointe-du-Lac, situated just East of Three Rivers on the shores of Lac St-Pierre and the adjoining Seigneurie of Gastineau, where the towns of Louiseville and Yamachiche, as well as the small Seigneuries of Pierreville, where is today the town of Pierreville and Deguise (Saint-David), today Drummondville, on the South shore of the Saint-Lawrence river.
Narratives of the time show Montour spent considerable money – Settlers qualified foolishly – to build houses for “errant Savages”
Fast forward to 1829, the Algonquin Nation was still trying to claim land to feed its citizens, as shown by a series of correspondences with the Indian Department of Québec.
In the next correspondence by Duchesnay, Superintendant of Indian Departmenr of Quebec, to Lt. Colonel Couper, Military Secretary, dated October 30, 1829, The Indian Department acknowledged that the neighboring Abenaki and Huron-Wendat were in agreement with the Algonquin land claim.
It appears obvious from these records and as well as by research into 20th century literature, that despite the loss of the land, the Algonquin Nation, who prefer to be called Metabenutin Uininis, remain in the vicinity of Three Rivers, despite non-recognition by either federal or provincial governments.
Many descendants of Metabenutin Uininis today identify as Magoua or Métis, following Nicholas Montour’s example. In fact, Nicholas Montour’s son, also named Nicolas, was christened in the nearby parish of Sainte-Geneviève de Berthier, under the surname of Mitif:
The descendants of Nicolas Montour, son, continued in the fur trade and later established themselves out West along with many of descendants of the Algonquin Nation, where they are today members of the many Métis communities in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta.
Further reading:
The Montour Family of Red river https://www.metismuseum.ca › …PDF
C’est qui papa, les Sauvages? Rémi Savard https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/raq/2010-v40-n1-2-raq5005322/1007503ar/
La mémoire orale contemporaine des Metabenutins Uininis (Algonquins de Trois-Rivières) Denys Delâge et Claude Hubert https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/raq/1900-v1-n1-raq5005322/1007500ar/
University of Quebec
https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca › …PDF
D’AUTREFOIS
Histoire de Trois-Rivières https://www.v3r.net/culture/histoire-et-patrimoine/histoire-de-trois-rivieres
Magouas et fiers de l’être, René Hardy: https://gazettemauricie.com/magouas-et-fiers-de-letre-2/
ResearchGate
https://www.researchgate.net › 2425…
(PDF) Les créolismes syntaxiques du français magoua parlé aux Trois …